What is leather? How is it cruel, you may be asking? The short answer is that the snazzy biker look you like has a dark past. At the end of the day, leather is the skin of a once living animal. The human need to be fashionable and fit in with trends has meant that innocent animals, but also people and our earth suffer.
To the animals, to the people and to the planet, your leather jacket carries with it a rather brutal reality. Just because it might look innocent, doesn’t mean it is. In the time it has taken you to read these first few sentences, worldwide 371 cows, 1.805 pigs, 1.456 rabbits and 76.038 chickens have been killed by animal industry 1. And that fact is not all that scared the crap out of us.
© Coralie Boon - @thula_art.
Leather is something that we have largely come to accept as a fact of life. We see it everywhere; on belts, bags, cars and even furniture. In marketplaces today, leather is often deceptively labelled ‘eco-friendly’, in the use of a byproduct. But its manufacturing is in itself energy intensive, inefficient and involves the use of harsh chemicals without even considering the damaging, unethical animal agricultural process from which it emerges.
The sources that were used to write this article can be found at the bottom of this page.
The use of chemicals is extreme and unregulated in leather tanning. Trying to escape the fact of skin decomposing, aggressive chemicals like chromium are used to preserve it and make it unrecognizable from its origins.
These chemicals flow largely untreated around tanneries creating a concoction of reactions incredibly damaging to the human bodies working there and the surrounding environment. Early deaths from cancer and skin diseases and dramatic skin bleaching are very real consequences.
Find out more about the poisonous chemicals used in leather.
By means of scraping the skin clean of hair, fat and flesh, as gross as it sounds, ‘tanning’ is essentially the process of preserving or mummifying animal skin by the application of harsh chemical pastes and acidic pickles. Not a way we usually think of animals right?
The leather industry is an important cog in the machine of animal cruelty. Animals are born, fed, impregnated, drugged, their babies torn away from them and killed in a lifetime cut unnaturally short all for humans to wear their skin and eat their flesh.
In his recent Oscar acceptance speech, Joaquin Phoenix reflected on how we have become disconnected from the natural world; our egocentric world-view making us feel entitled to the ‘products’ that animals can provide us. In this world he spotlights the need for us to be a voice for the voiceless.
Leather often doesn’t look like the skin of an innocent animal; we contribute to this disconnection from the natural world by trying to hide the horrific reality of what actually happens behind closed doors that desperately needs to be realized. But there is no need for this cruelty and there are fantastic animal-free alternatives on the market now that are practically identical!
Find out more about what leather means for animals.
Continue reading the article below this video.
A constant river of tannery waste flows through areas of high leather exports. Alongside toxic chemical flows, the offcuts of the processed animal skin blocks the area's waterways and the stench of rotting flesh can be smelled consistently throughout the nearby homes.
Not only this, but industrial scale animal agriculture releases enormous amounts of methane gas per animal, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions to an even higher degree than fracking. Additionally, the amounts of food and water that are used for the years the animals are being raised until their slaughter, could be otherwise re-directed to people in efforts to combat world hunger.
But this is just a snapshot of how bad leather can be. In this article we’ll delve into the realities of leather manufacturing and what it truly means for the animals, the planet and the humans involved.
Find out more about how leather harms our environment.
From every angle - the animal, the human and the environment - leather production invisibly exploits and takes advantage. What we cannot see does not happen, or so the saying goes. Leather, amongst other modern industries by its very nature as a capitalistic enterprise, is always looking for the shortcut.
Humans enslave, mass-farm and kill animals for efficiency and profit. Leather businesses in the Western world milk weak labour laws and take advantage of being able to employ cheap labour in the East. Low pay, low safety standards and child labor are oftentimes completely invisible in the leather industry
Most extensive of all perhaps is the player that can’t protest, raise a voice or fight at all, our planet. By means of exploitation, inequality and blindness, the leather industry profits from an unethical system at every angle. With this article we are going to shine a harsh spotlight on the cruelty behind leather and prove that it’s completely avoidable in the 21st century. As Phoenix reflects on in his speech, in terms of change:
“We fear the idea of change because we think we have to sacrifice something or give something up, but human beings at our best are so inventive, creative and ingenious.”
We can do much better and ethical answers are beginning to soar, we just need to increase awareness of what making a product like leather truly means.
Yes, leather is straight up toxic. In the process of scraping and drying animal skin, modern leather production has introduced the use of metal salts to massively speed up a process that historically took months, to just a few days.
Of these chemicals, chromium and arsenic are both classed as a group 1 carcinogen ??2. By working in close proximity to these chemicals, those employed in the tanning industry expose themselves to a massively increased chance of developing cancer.
Overall cancer rates of tannery workers are far higher than normal levels. Leukemia specifically can occur up to 5 times as often if you live near a tannery 3 4 .
So without even acknowledging factors of severe animal cruelty and destruction of the physical environment (more on this later), the process of tanning leather itself has a profound human health impact on those both directly involved in its production but also those who might unconsciously reside close to such a process.
In an industry that employs nearly half a million people in the EU alone 5, the human cost in the toxicity of leather is not something to be overlooked.
But these statistics aren't even from the areas in which the majority of tanneries are located. With far less stringent health and safety regulations from the government, countries like Bangladesh see the human burdens of the leather industry on a far more extreme level.
Continue reading the article below this image.
© 2020 Daniel Lanteigne.
With nearly 200 tanneries, the Dhaka district of Hazaribagh is one of the most polluted urban areas in the world, locals experience smells so foul that they induce constant nausea and vomiting.
According to the Human Rights Watch, skin diseases, respiratory and stomach problems are rife within the local community as a result of the lack of waste treatment facilities connected to the tanneries and lack of gloves and safety equipment for handling chemicals.
Tanneries are so prevalent and in such dire conditions throughout Dhaka that research shows that most of those who work there will die before they reach 50 6.
A commonly heard response to the arguments against leather, similar to those made against veganism, is that leather, like eating meat, has been present in human society for an incredibly long time. To that I respond that yes, animals have been a part of human civilization for as long as time, but killing has always been killing and today it is unprecedented.
In our 21st century lives, technological developments have made the use of animals as meat and dairy a massive global industry that has fostered a business based on the rearing and eventual slaughter of animals on a scale unparalleled throughout human history. Yet, it is simply unnecessary.
This dramatic surge in animal slaughter numbers is just the tale end of a figure that has been growing exponentially with industrialisation and the ability to farm animals on an astonishing scale.
Thus despite the killing of animals for human material use and consumption having always existed, with references to leather tanning in early Assyrian texts and Homer’s Iliad 8, the 21st century has taken something objectively grim and transformed it to numbers difficult to comprehend.
Leather production and its effects prior to mechanisation are incomparable to the extremes the industry has embraced now.
Sunny Leone for a PETAIndia campaign.
With modern technology and the discovery of metal salts to aid the process of tanning in the mid 20th century, the production time of leather has decreased from up to a year to a period of just a couple of days.
With this new and improved process combined with the scale of animal agriculture, leather manufacturing emerges in the 21st century, at a glance, as an economically viable option. But all is not as it seems. The new methods of production and efficiency has only meant more and more deaths. It is now both easier to factory farm, breed and slaughter en masse, but also come to an end product of leather far far faster.
21st century animal agriculture and fast fashion have allowed cruelty towards animals to occur at a rate and severity beyond anything previously understood despite it being unnecessary .
Again, not only animals have suffered under the mass industry boom of animal agriculture. Countries like Bangladesh and India have benefited from outsourced labour as the industry has grown, with leather becoming a significant part of their exports.
But this industrialisation comes with its own challenges. With an increase in labour and focus on profit, health and safety standards have fallen with dire consequences like those detailed above. It’s all intertwined.
It is also important to recognise the economic factors involved in the production of leather. Yes, leather is largely produced in cooperation with the meat and dairy industry and can sometimes be misconstrued as a byproduct.
The skin of an animal is approximated to 10%-20% of its total value and therefore equally motivated by consumer demand for leather as a product in its own right 9. If you compare the price payoff with the small percentage that the animal's skin composes in relation to the whole body, leather has in fact become the most economically valuable part of the animal. Leather isn’t simply making use of a by-product.
By buying leather you aren’t being mindful of waste, but financially contributing to an economy in which the animals are killed for the product. Leather isn’t waste but a valuable secondary product. The global leather industry is set to reach a massive $128.61 billion USD by 2022 if things don’t change10.
An estimated 70 billion animals are slaughtered for human consumption each year11. Differently put, a chilling realisation to us: 124,000 farmed animals are slaughtered globally every minute. You can’t have your cake and eat it too as it were: if you want animal leather, you have to end a life. If you want meat, you have to kill an animal. Or (indirectly) pay someone to do it for you.
As mentioned previously, the scale of animal slaughter has increased at an unprecedented rate throughout the past century as a result of an increasing demand for animal products. It’s hard to picture these numbers, the lives of factory farmed animals can easily become meaningless when put into a graph.
© The Vegan Calculator. Click to see live version.
Even with these cruel and industrial lifestyles, the death of these animals is hardly more dignified with slaughter practices rife with carelessness, lack of proper prior stunning and weak animal protection laws.
Methods such as electric stunning and the bolt gun both produce a quick, pain free death, whereas the commonly practiced slitting of the throat results in a lot of animals experiencing a long, painful and drawn out death.
This is especially true of the leather industry which, in order to preserve as much of the skin as possible, often skins them alive, not using stun guns or quick methods of death.
On top of this, the young are often separated from their mothers very early and killed for a softer and more tender leather. Not to mention, industrial farmed animals also undergo the brutal process of ownership branding or dehorning in their lifetimes12.
And yes, many of these animals are killed for the meat and dairy industry, but leather is also popular from animals like snakes, cats and dogs, where their meat largely isn't even wanted. From the lack of traceability and rampant mislabelling that surrounds the leather industry, you might not even know if the leather belt you bought was cat or cow skin.
Particularly a problem in countries home to the more exotic types of leather such as snake skin, elephant skin and zebra, illegal animal poaching has led to an unregulated leather industry. Leather production associated with poaching is therefore incredibly hard to detect from a consumer perspective with rampant mislabelling or even lack thereof contributing to the absence of transparency in the industry as a whole13.
What you might read as a trustworthy and local ‘Made In…’ label, mainly just means ‘designed in’. This subtle loophole makes it even harder to trust the leather industry and track where and how far a certain product has travelled, not to mention what animal cruelty standards and laws were actually met in its production.
Being directly linked to the meat and dairy industry the production of leather is tied to a mass animal agriculture and its profound impact on our planet.
Imagine this. Throughout her short life, an average cow (who could live to 20 to 25 years without human intervention, but who's life is cut short to about 5 to 7 years before she's being send to the slaughterhouse) is fed hundreds of thousands liters of water and tens of thousands of kilos of cattle fodder. Valuable resources that are very inefficiently used in our current, unsustainable food chain.
On top of that, ruminants emit massive amounts of methane through belching and through flatulence (yep, cow burps and farts). Methane can have a big effect on the climate crisis too, because methane is a potent greenhouse gas that's about 25 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at warming the Earth!
In the actual process of the production of leather in itself however, it is no less harmful.
As mentioned before, chromium plays a large part in the modern process of tanning, but it does not only have an impact on a human level, but equally on the surrounding environment. More than 170,000 tons of incredibly carcinogenic chromium waste is released into the environment every single year14.
The leather industry possesses a large amount of fluid waste that is often heavily concentrated with the harsh metals like chromium used in the tanning processes. This toxic fluid waste runs into natural water systems leading to the disruption of the local ecosystems and their organic condition.
Take the case of Kanpur in Pakistan, where 50 million litres of wastewater from local tanneries flows into the surrounding farmland and the River Ganges every day.
That’s around 20 Olympic sized swimming pools’ worth. Only 20% of this water is treated, resulting in devastating instances of disease for local residents as well as long term detrimental effects on the environment.
Not only is this wastewater heavily concentrated with chemicals, but much of the water is also used in the process of scraping and de-fleshing the hide. As a result of this, tannery wastewater is often full of hair and bits of fleshy fat and mold prone to blocking waterways and contaminating freshwater systems15.
Hazaribagh, the tanning district of Dhaka I mentioned before, was named one of the 5 most polluted environments in the entire world. In an interview with Al Jazeera, Syeda Rizwana Hasan from the Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association stated:
The amount and combination of chemical waste flowing out of these Dhaka tanneries is not even known, resulting in a sort of ‘pandora’s box’ of chemical reactions. The effects of this mixture are impossible to know on both the people coming into contact with them as well as the local waterways. Imagine living there…
Not only is there a large amount of contaminated wastewater produced during the tanning procedure, with a single hide usually resulting in up to 500 bathtubs worth of waste-water!
When looking at the entire lifecycle of leather, it is estimated that the total annual water consumption for leather from cattle alone is 400 billion litres. From beginning to end, animal agriculture in combination with the manufacturing of leather paints an incredibly resource intensive and chemically concentrated picture 17.
But again everything is interconnected and it is not just the animals directly killed in the process that are impacted by this industry, but also those indirectly impacted in the surrounding environment. Waste water released from the tanneries often ends up in natural waterways, drastically impacting marine life.
Eutrophication is one of the main consequences in bodies of water in which the waste leads to an over concentration of minerals in the water.
This in turn creates an excess of algae which consumes all of the oxygen in the water and blocks out light, eventually killing any fish and various other marine life in that body of water. This is without even acknowledging the impact of the chromium in the water that is ingested by fish, leading to physical abnormalities amongst their population.
Animal agriculture on a global scale covers the planet, diverting a huge percentage of land to cattle grazing and the growing of crops to sustain these animals, for which the payoff is just over a quarter of global caloric supply.
According to statistics from the FAO, nearly 80% of agricultural land is used for livestock 18. A lot of numbers I know, but that is a massive amount of land diverted towards animal grazing and the growing of grain to feed the 70+ billion animals a year raised for human consumption. A lot of animals whose diet could be otherwise re-directed to people in efforts to combat world hunger.
As an example, in the last 50 years alone, up to 70% of the Amazon Rainforest has been cleared for the production of largely soy-bean crops needed to feed the global animal farming industry19. In addition to destroying indigenous homelands, imagine the sheer quantity of grain that space produces for animals that only reaches the human as a secondary consumer. So no, it’s not soy for your soy cappuccino or tofu, it’s almost all for animal feed.
Imagine how much impact that grain and water could have if only it was used as a cheap primary product for human consumption…
There is more grain produced to feed cattle that feed humans than is grown to directly feed humans. A Cornell study suggests that the US could feed up to 800 million people with the grain it uses to feed its livestock 20.
The resource consumption is thus far out of proportion with the yield in a global economy where animals are used as raw materials, not to mention contributing to the destruction of worldwide biodiversity and habitats.
Looking at leather as an arm of the global animal agriculture industry, livestock itself is responsible for almost a quarter of human-caused greenhouse emissions. The majority of this is a result of methane released from the digestive processes of animals, a gas that is far more detrimental than carbon dioxide for the first few decades of its release.
The majority of the CO2 emissions surrounding the production of leather come from the ‘raw materials’ of animal agriculture, but another factor specific to leather emerges in travel.
Tanneries and slaughterhouses are largely located in South-East Asia, out of which the finished leather is flown to Western Europe and the USA for further manufacturing. A ‘Made in…’ stamp only has to refer to the latter part of the entire leather manufacturing process that often possesses a lot more air miles than one might think.
Many so-called EU leather manufacturers have delocalized production and outsourced to Asia. The General Secretary of the COTANCE EU Leather Industry states that they see no need to label their products with ‘Made in Bangladesh’ 21.
The amount of outsourced labour to areas like Dhaka, Bangladesh have meant that these governments are especially unwilling to transition to less energy intensive and low-waste means of leather manufacturing.
With increasing tax revenue surrounding their export, implementing new technologies and more stringent animal and human welfare within slaughterhouses and tanneries simply means disrupting an incredibly lucrative industry that brings in over $1 billion per year despite these methods being available22.
Jake Brown Cork...
€ 119,20€ 149,00
Will's Vegan Shoes
Camille Vegan Bags
ÉGÉE - Piñatex ...
€ 169,00€ 183,00
Will's Vegan Shoes
Faux Snake Ankl...
Camille Vegan Bags
Hobo OMAN - Piñ...
Despite all of this being super overwhelming, all hope is not lost however and you can definitely still rock the head to toe biker look cruelty free!
Innovative plant-based alternatives to leather are now luckily commonplace, with materials like cork, kelp, mushrooms, recycled rubber, apple peel, pineapple fiber and even wine remnants being woven into malleable leather-like fabric.
Just this week, a new type of vegan leather (or fleather) made from Indian temple flowers has been announced!23
There are so many different alternatives to leather on the market right now all offering something different. Some look closer to leather than others, some are more sustainably made and some are significantly cheaper but none exploit animals or humans to the extent that the traditional leather industry has. Ethical and sustainable solutions are coming, we just need to persevere and strive for truth and transparency surrounding products like leather.
So to end I’ll leave you with another quote from Joaquin Phoenix’s Oscar speech with some hope for our future:
3. Richard E. Sclove et al., Community-Based Research in the United States (Amherst: The Loka Institute, 1998) 52.
4. France Labrèche, Occupations and Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Associations Between Breast Cancer and Workplace Exposures (Montréal: McGill University, 1997).
8. Bhavya, Karanam & Selvarani, Jenifer & Samrot, Antony & Thevarkattil, Pazhayakath & Mohamed, Javad & Appalaraju, V. (2019). Leather Processing, Its Effects on Environment and Alternatives of Chrome Tanning. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering & Technology. 10. 69-79.
15. The Toxic Price of Leather